FeetFinder vs FunWithFeet: The Honest Breakdown
These two platforms dominate Google searches in the “feet content” niche. But popularity doesn’t always mean “best,” and both platforms have serious issues creators complain about every day.
This comparison focuses on **fees**, **traffic**, **earnings**, **safety**, and **actual creator experience** — not marketing hype.
1. Pricing & Fees: Where Most Creators Get Shocked
FeetFinder: Mandatory Subscription Fees
FeetFinder requires creators to subscribe just to stay active:
- • $4.99/month (Basic)
- • $14.99/month (Premium)
This means **you pay even when you make $0**. It’s the biggest complaint among beginners.
FunWithFeet: One-Time Listing Fee… That Adds Up
On the surface, FunWithFeet looks better:
**$9.99 for a 3-month seller listing**
But creators say the traffic is so low that most listings expire before they make anything meaningful.
Footly: No Subscriptions, Commission-Only
**0 subscription fees, 20% commission** → You only pay **after** you make money.
2. Traffic & Buyers: Who Actually Has Customers?
Let’s be blunt here: creator success is mostly about buyer traffic. And this is where the two platforms differ massively.
FeetFinder
• Highest traffic of the two • Still nowhere near OnlyFans or Fansly • Traffic quality is hit-or-miss • Many buyers expect **cheap** content
FunWithFeet
• Very low traffic • Many creators report **0–3 sales per month** • Buyer verification is weak • Hard to build momentum
Footly
• Algorithmic TikTok-style feed • Built for discovery • Great for **new creators** who have no follower base • Mobile-first browsing increases sales
3. Safety & Verification
FeetFinder
- • Slower verification (2–7 days)
- • No anonymous browsing
- • Mixed buyer quality
FunWithFeet
- • Weak moderation
- • Known for fake buyers
- • Minimal privacy features
Footly
- • 24-hour automated verification
- • Anonymous mode
- • Custom billing descriptors
- • Strong moderation
4. Earnings Potential in 2025
Creator income varies wildly, but these ranges are consistent across community reports.
| Platform | Typical Income | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| FeetFinder | $300–$900/mo | Subscription fees reduce net income; good only with steady sales |
| FunWithFeet | $0–$200/mo | Low traffic = low earnings; inconsistent buyers |
| Footly | $300–$2,000/mo* | *Results vary; discovery feed boosts new creators |
Final Verdict: Which Platform Wins in 2025?
**FeetFinder wins on traffic.** **FunWithFeet wins on upfront cost.**
But neither wins on **creator experience**, **income stability**, or **modern platform design**.
FeetFinder’s mandatory fees punish beginners. FunWithFeet’s low traffic punishes everyone.
In 2025, creators are overwhelmingly choosing platforms that:
- ✓ Don’t charge subscription fees
- ✓ Don’t require constant off-platform marketing
- ✓ Actually help with discovery
- ✓ Have modern UI and safety features
And that’s why commission-only platforms like **Footly** are quickly becoming the place creators start instead.